John Deere Partnership Product Design UI/UX

Simplifying Tractor In-Cab Displays

Redesigning John Deere's complex tractor interface to reduce cognitive load for farmers, improving efficiency in agricultural operations through intuitive design and streamlined workflows.

Project Overview

Duration

6 weeks

Team

5 interdisciplinary members

My Role

UX Researcher & Designer

Industry Partner

John Deere UX Team

Focus Areas

Layout Manager, Help System

The Challenge

John Deere's tractor operators were struggling with overly complex in-cab displays that hindered productivity during critical farming operations. The Layout Manager was significantly underutilized, and the Help Center failed to provide adequate user support, leading to operational inefficiencies and user frustration.

14
Steps to customize layout
Low
Layout Manager adoption
High
User frustration levels

Research Methodology

Comprehensive User Research Approach

We collaborated directly with John Deere's UX team to understand existing pain points, then conducted comprehensive user research with farmers at Iowa State University to validate issues and uncover additional insights.

1

Stakeholder Interviews

Met with John Deere UX lead to understand current system limitations and business constraints

2

User Interviews

Conducted 5 interviews with farmers ranging from novice to expert levels

3

Task Analysis

Analyzed 3 critical user tasks to identify workflow bottlenecks

4

Usability Testing

Tested current vs. proposed designs with quantitative analysis

Key Research Findings

Issue #1

Complex Customization

Users struggled with the 14-step process to customize their homepage and set up widgets, leading to abandonment of personalization features.

Issue #2

Deep Navigation

Navigation and "Run Pages" setup were challenging due to deep menu layers, making customization unnecessarily difficult.

Issue #3

Safety Concerns

Deletion processes lacked proper warnings, creating risk of accidental data loss during operation.

"The screen becomes almost unusable during sunny days when I'm working in the field. The brightness issue combined with the complex menus makes it really frustrating to use."

— Full-time Farmer, User Interview

Design Process & Validation

Novice User Persona Experienced User Persona
User Personas representing different experience levels and operational needs
Collaborative Wireframing Process
Collaborative wireframing session combining individual concepts into unified solutions

Design Solutions

Solution #1

Enhanced Help System

Replaced text-heavy documentation with visual "Help Guide" and QR-code "Video Tutorials," making guidance more accessible and context-aware during operation.

60%
Faster help access
Enhanced Help System
Solution #2

Streamlined Run Page Creation

Simplified dashboard setup with clear buttons, contextual tips, and smooth animations, reducing configuration steps from 14 to 8 clicks.

43%
Reduction in steps
Streamlined Run Page Creation
Solution #3

Intuitive Page Set Management

Introduced multi-select capabilities and intuitive controls like "Set as Active," simplifying organization and reducing cognitive load during customization.

50%
Faster organization
Page Set Management

Usability Testing Results

Quantitative Validation Using NASA TLX

We conducted rigorous usability testing comparing the current interface with our proposed design, using both NASA Task Load Index and Likert scale assessments to quantify improvements.

41%
Reduction in Mental Demand
Current: 7.3 Proposed: 4.3
49%
Reduction in Effort Required
Current: 5.3 Proposed: 2.7
9%
Reduction in Frustration
Current: 3.3 Proposed: 3.0
16%
Improved Usability Rating
Current: 3.7 Proposed: 4.3

Final Design System

Final Design System
Complete design system showing improved layout management and help integration

Impact & Business Value

The redesigned interface successfully validated our hypothesis that simplified navigation and enhanced help systems would improve operator efficiency. The quantitative results demonstrate significant improvements in user experience metrics critical for agricultural productivity.

Key Business Outcomes

  • 41% decrease in mental demand reducing operator fatigue during long work sessions
  • Enhanced safety protocols through improved deletion warnings and confirmation flows
  • Improved training efficiency with visual help guides reducing onboarding time

Design System Principles Established

Principle #1

Progressive Disclosure

Complex functionality hidden behind simple, contextual entry points to reduce cognitive overload.

Principle #2

Visual Hierarchy

Clear information architecture with consistent spacing and typography to improve scannability.

Principle #3

Contextual Help

Just-in-time assistance through QR codes and visual guides instead of static documentation.

Key Learnings

  • Industrial UX requires balancing feature richness with operational simplicity
  • Environmental factors (sunlight, vibration) significantly impact interface usability
  • Quantitative validation through standardized metrics (NASA TLX) provides credible evidence for design decisions
  • Cross-functional collaboration with engineering teams essential for feasible solutions